Home > Parse Error > Parse Error Opacity=10

Parse Error Opacity=10

If you ((really)) need it to validate, you can take out all the browser specific CSS thats causing the validation errors, place those in a separate CSS file and use document.write Click on 'More Options' and select CSS3 from the profiles menu. more hot questions question feed default about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation It doesn't validate to the 2.1 level that the validator is probably running at.My advice: don't worry about it. have a peek here

I am unsure as of yet whether this issue will be corrected before final release. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up W3C Validator error: Parse Error opacity=60 up vote 0 down vote favorite I've run a stylesheet through the CSS validator at W3C... computerbarry 2009-02-20 22:00:41 UTC #5 Thanks a lot guys, it's always a lot better to hear this from some other experienced coders, I've always stuck to the W3C standards and always asked 3 years ago viewed 1727 times active 2 years ago Related 0W3C Validator error: Parse Error opacity=602Where does the error output from recess go when used from the command line

There is a heap of tools that validate it but don't really tell you how to fix it...unless I don't understand it. Thanks AlexDawson 2009-02-20 23:39:57 UTC #9 logic_earth said: Could use the short hand version too. -ms-filter: "alpha(opacity=50)"; I tried it in IE 8 RC and seems to have worked. Invision Power Board © 2001-2016 Invision Power Services, Inc. I just download the files, upload it and put the lines of code that I need into my program.

Ron PayneLess Designs Reply With Quote 11-09-2010,07:10 PM #3 Barons View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date Nov 2010 Posts 32 Thanks for the advice! Longest "De Bruijn phrase" in English How to improve this plot? Internet Explorer > Internet Explorer 8, 9, 10, 11 Question 0 Sign in to vote In the default bootstrap.css I got from Visual Studio, I have the following CSS: filter: alpha(opacity=65); That's the price you pay for using new features I guess 24th February, 22:42 Post: #3 sparky672 Member Posts: 172 Joined: Jan 2011 Reputation: 0 RE: CSS Validation??

Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:12 PM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote Hi, As the issue is specific withInternet Explore Develoment, you may contact Microsoft Internet Explore Is there a plan in place to clean up the CSS to reduce these compliance errors & warnings? 24th February, 22:39 Post: #2 Craig Creator Posts: 5,586 Joined: Feb 2010 Reputation: Any more stupid and useless advice? Any positioning works.

pandy Nov 13 2010, 11:09 AM No, it's all or nothing.I can think of two ways. Today's Posts FAQ Rules Guidelines Search Advanced Search Forum :: Client side development HTML & CSS CSS opacity tags - won't validate If this is your first visit, be sure to If your browser sees a selector that it doesn't recognize, it just ignores it, which is part of the specs.The more standard browsers all recognize opacity because of how useful it You are incorrect and if you look at my test case then it does work in RC1.

I just thought the errors about missing semicolons, empty strings, and "too many values" were odd. 24th February, 23:20 Post: #4 Craig Creator Posts: 5,586 Joined: Feb 2010 Reputation: 42 RE: http://forum.cs-cart.com/topic/38640-parse-error-opacity0/ Jump to content - Community Forums Manuals KB Ideas Members List Bug tracker Sign In or Create Account Search Search section: This topic This forum ForumsMembers ListHelp Files Bug tracker Powered by vBulletinCopyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Forum Search Portfolio Projects Please Log-in or Register to get full access to the forums. Please help.

remove them and check share|improve this answer answered Dec 8 '10 at 9:15 Anish Joseph 7672719 Thanks For Reply. –Rakesh Prajapati Dec 9 '10 at 10:02 add a comment| navigate here Barons Nov 9 2010, 05:10 PM Thanks for all the advice.QUOTE(pandy @ Nov 7 2010, 11:36 PM) One way to keep it a little cleaner, or seemingly so anyway, is to IE6's fix (twinhelix at least) takes up a good 30 lines of code somewhere. 30>6. Microsoft Customer Support Microsoft Community Forums Register Help Remember Me?

What is the main spoken language in Kiev: Ukrainian or Russian? The -moz-opacity won't validate though but is only needed for older gecko and could be dropped anyway. I challenge you to find anything in the CSS1 spec saying they should use the above notation. Check This Out Why shared_timed_mutex is defined in c++14, but shared_mutex in c++17?

Problem to left align within a split Was the Boeing 747 designed to be supersonic? This is similar to trying to validate HTML 2.0 when using HTML 4.01 Strict syntax, cater to the highest denominator ( validation-wise ) basically. What shape is a Calippo?

The fact of the matter is opacity wasn't standardized early enough...and to use it is hacky, it wont validate...either accept that it won't validate or remove it from all browsers that

However, I guess we have to assume that support may be dropped completely due to the fact that the old filters don't follow the correct rules for vendor specific extensions and Archive Forgot password? | Register Remember Me? Line #95: filter:alpha(opacity=70); As far as the IE filter opacity property goes, you could implement an additional IE-specific stylesheet after the main stylesheet via conditional comments. Not a member yet?

Do not be ashamed to use CSS 3 in your website, it shows you are keeping up with the times. Barons Nov 13 2010, 02:09 PM Yeah!!!! Do these physical parameters seem plausible? this contact form The error can safely be ignored.